Venue: the Hub, Mareham Road, Horncastle, Lincolnshire LN9 6PH
Contact: Lynda Eastwood Democratic Services Officer
Media
No. | Item | |
---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence: Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Sam Kemp.
|
||
Disclosure of Interests (if any): Minutes: At this point in the Meeting, Members were invited to disclose any relevant interests. The following interests were disclosed:
|
||
To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 5 December 2024. Minutes: The Minutes of the Meeting held on 5 December 2024 were confirmed and signed as a correct record.
|
||
Update from Planning Policy Committee Minutes: Councillor Terry Aldridge advised Members that the next meeting had been postponed and would now take place on 27 February 2025 to consider updates to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and Local Plan. |
||
S/152/02014/23: View the Plans and documents online, please click on the Application Number. (Please note: If viewing as a pdf document, this hyperlink is not available).
Applicant: Towey Homes Limited
Location: Land rear of, Page Close, Sibsey
Recommendation: Approval with Section 106 agreement
Officer: Lindsey Stuart
Additional documents: Minutes: Application Type: Full Planning Permission
Proposal: Planning Permission - Erection of 83 dwellings with landscaping, associated works, the construction of surface water attenuation basin and vehicular access.
Location: LAND REAR OF, PAGE CLOSE, SIBSEY
Applicant: Towey Homes Limited
Members received an application for Full Planning Permission – Erection of 83 dwellings with landscaping, associated works, the construction of surface water attenuation basin and vehicular access at land rear of Page Close, Sibsey.
The application was considered appropriate for consideration by the Planning Committee given the range of issues for consideration including, specifically, a need to consider implications arising from viability considerations for the proposed development.
The main planning issues were considered to be:
· Principle of the Development in this Location · Impact on the Character of the Area · Impact on the Amenity of Neighbours · Highway safety and Capacity · Surface and Foul Water Disposal · S.106 matters including Affordable Housing and Other Contributions · Other matters - Impact on TPO's, Archaeology and Biodiversity Net Gain
Lindsey Stuart, Principal Planning Officer, detailed site and surroundings information to Members at Paragraph 2, together with the description of the proposal at Paragraph 3, pages 11 to 12 of the report refer.
Mr Simon Atha (Agent) spoke in support of the application.
Members were invited to put their questions to the speakers.
- A Member queried whether any 1 bedroom houses would be included in the scheme and Mr Atha confirmed that the proposal included 1 to 4 bedroom dwellings.
- A Member queried why there were no solar panels on the proposal.
In response, Mr Atha explained that with the new building regulations that came in to effect last June there were enhanced and increased efficiency standards that house builders needed to meet. He informed Members that the developer may provide some solar panels as part of the process of making the dwelling as efficient as possible and that it would be looked at later in the process.
- In relation to the NHS provision and S106 Agreement a Member queried whether negotiations had taken place with the NHS with regards to the health service provision in Stickney and the growing number of residents.
Mr Atha advised Members that there was a package of infrastructure that had been agreed with financial contributions to be split between the health and education authorities. Mr Atha added that he would expect the money to be used to enhance the facilities at the nearest health facility.
Following which, the application was opened for debate.
- Following on from a request for further information on the financial contributions towards the health service, the Principal Planning Officer explained that the NHS had requested that the mitigation was for impact on several surgeries in the development catchment area including Stickney, Paragraph 7.10 on page 20 of the report refers.
- Following a query with regards to the distance from the site to the Dorothy Close crossing, the Principal Planning Officer advised that the exact distance was not known, however it would ... view the full minutes text for item 77. |
||
S/177/01345/24: View the Plans and documents online, please click on the Application Number. (Please note: If viewing as a pdf document, this hyperlink is not available).
Applicant: Mr & Mrs R Whitley
Location: Land at Manor Farm, East Road, Tetford
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
Officer: Graeme Hyde
Additional documents: Minutes: Application Type: Full Planning Permission
Proposal: Planning Permission - Erection of 1no. pair of semi detached dwellings, construction of a vehicular access and internal access road.
Location: LAND AT MANOR FARM, EAST ROAD, TETFORD
Applicant: Mr. &. Mrs. R. Whitley
Members received an application for Full Planning Permission – Erection of 1no. pair of semi detached dwellings, construction of a vehicular access and internal access road at land at Manor Farm, East Road, Tetford.
The proposal fell within the Council's scheme of delegation however when the previous outline application on site was determined by committee, Members required that subsequent Reserved Matters were brought to committee. Although this was not technically a Reserved Matters application, it was the first detailed application at the site and in line with Members request, so was presented to committee for determination.
The main planning issues were considered to be:
· Principle/AONB/open space/design · Heritage assets · Biodiversity · Access · Drainage · Impact of the development on the amenity of the neighbours
Graeme Hyde, Senior Planning Officer, detailed site and surroundings information to Members at Paragraph 2, together with the description of the proposal at Paragraph 3, pages 33 to 34 of the report refer.
Councillor Daniel Simpson spoke as Ward Member.
Members were invited to put their questions to the speakers. None were received.
Following which, the application was opened for debate.
- A Member raised a concern with regards to the drainage and surface water and referenced Paragraph 7.56, page 48 of the report refers and requested that a condition be put in place to address the issue.
Following which, the application was proposed for approval in line with officer recommendation.
- A Member queried whether the development would be delivered with a piecemeal approach and the Senior Planning Officer advised that he thought it would.
Following which, the application was seconded for approval in line with officer recommendation.
Upon being put to the vote, the proposal for approval in line with officer recommendation, subject to conditions was agreed.
Vote: 12 In favour 0 Against 0 Abstention
RESOLVED:
That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:
|
||
Appeals Decided: Minutes: The Appeals Decided were noted. |
||
Delegated Decisions: Minutes: The Delegated Decisions were noted.
|
||
Date of Next Meeting: Minutes: The date of the next meeting was noted as Thursday 13 February 2025.
|