Questions:
To answer questions pursuant to Council Procedure Rule 11.
Minutes:
|
Question 1 |
Councillor George Horton |
|
Subject |
Sexual Harassment and Bullying training |
|
Response by |
Councillor Craig Leyland, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Corporate Affairs |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 2 |
Councillor George Horton |
|
Subject |
Alternative site for 3G pitch in Louth |
|
Response by |
Councillor Graham Marsh, Deputy Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Community Safety, Leisure and Culture and Carbon Reduction. |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 3 |
Councillor George Horton |
|
Subject |
Data on Fly Tipping |
|
Response by |
Councillor Martin Foster, Portfolio Holder for Operational Services |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 4 |
Councillor Jill Makinson-Sanders |
|
Subject |
Louth and Drink Festival |
|
Response by |
Councillor Adam Grist, Portfolio Holder for Market Towns and the Rural Economy/Councillor Thomas Kemp, Portfolio Holder for Finance |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 5 |
Councillor Jill Makinson-Sanders |
|
Subject |
Louth Market |
|
Response by |
Councillor Martin Foster, Portfolio Holder for Operational Services |
|
Supplementary |
I’ve had a request from stallholders who are height-challenged and struggle to put covers on their stalls. Telling them to bring steps isn’t practical. Can we do more to support traders with these kinds of issues? |
|
Response |
There’s a lot of positive work happening with the new market initiatives. I’ve noted your concerns about stall setup assistance and will pass this on to the market officers. Our team is present on market days and does try to help, especially in poor weather conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Question 6 |
Councillor Jill Makinson-Sanders |
|
Subject |
Councillor attendance on Outside Bodies |
|
Response by |
Councillor Craig Leyland, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Corporate Affairs |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 7 |
Councillor Daniel Simpson |
|
Subject |
Progression of Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) |
|
Response by |
Councillor Craig Leyland, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Corporate Affairs |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 8 |
Councillor Daniel Simpson |
|
Subject |
Costs for developing LGR options |
|
Response by |
Councillor Craig Leyland, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Corporate Affairs |
|
Supplementary |
None |
|
|
|
|
Question 9 |
Councillor Edward Mossop |
|
Subject |
Sutton on Sea Colonnade |
|
Response by |
Councillor Steve Kirk, Portfolio Holder for the Coastal Economy |
|
Supplementary |
What is the actual plan for the space in the Colonnade and how will it fulfil the original bid’s ambitions? |
|
Response |
I’ll respond in writing due to the commercially sensitive nature of the details. |
|
|
|
|
Question 10 |
Councillor Jill Makinson-Sanders |
|
Subject |
Development of new houses in Louth |
|
Response by |
Councillor Tom Ashton, Portfolio Holder for Planning |
|
Supplementary |
I’m raising concerns from Louth. We don’t have enough doctors and more housing keeps being added. The government wants growth, but we can’t take any more. I know you support growth, but we haven’t resolved the conservation area either. What are you going to do about this? |
|
Response |
The government’s housing targets represent a 150% increase, which is a major challenge. We believe the methodology behind these targets is flawed and are actively challenging it with MHCLG. Due to the loss of our five-year housing supply, there’s a presumption in favour of sustainable development, making it hard to resist certain applications. We won’t see more houses built than market demand allows, and we’ll continue to fight for realistic targets and work toward a revised spatial strategy. |
|
|
|
|
Question 11 |
Councillor Jill Makinson-Sanders |
|
Subject |
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Council processes |
|
Response by |
Councillor Craig Leyland, Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Corporate Affairs |
|
Supplementary |
All services are ‘empowered to consider’ how AI might be used. I’d like to see stronger language. AI has many applications, in planning, environment, revenues and benefits and could help us save money for other priorities. Is the Council dragging its heels? Can we use a more proactive term than ‘consider’? |
|
Response |
We do consider AI where appropriate, but not all services are suited to it. We aim to match technology to service needs, and I believe the current response is fair and balanced. |
|
|
|
A full copy of the questions is attached at Appendix 1 to these Minutes.
Supporting documents: